System Observers - sunlight is the best disinfectant - MORE
A little sunlight -

is both dangerous and useful ...

TL/DR:James Bryce : 1888 : The American Commonwealth

The conscience and common sense of the nation as a whole keep down the evils which have crept into the working of the Constitution, and may in time extinguish them. Public opinion is a sort of atmosphere, fresh, keen, and full of sunlight, like that of the American cities, and this sunlight kills many of those noxious germs which are hatched where politicians congregate. That which, varying a once famous phrase, we may call the genius of universal publicity, has some disagreeable results, but the wholesome ones are greater and more numerous. Selfishness, injustice, cruelty, tricks, and jobs of all sorts shun the light; to expose them is to defeat them. No serious evils, no rankling sore in the body politic, can remain long concealed, and when disclosed, it is half destroyed.


Maru stands for circle or ship in Japanese.

Maru is also a recurring part of Star Trek, whereby Captain Kirk reprograms a simulator (system) that has been designed to not allow success.

The system is called the Kobayashi Maru : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru

KOBAYASHI MARU : "The test's name is occasionally used among Star Trek fans or those familiar with the series to describe a no-win scenario, a test of one's character or a solution that involves redefining the problem and managing an insurmountable scenario gracefully."

We think a system that covers up judicial violations of due process and false statements by judges counts as "a test of one's character" and "a no-win scenario" or an "insurmountable scenario" to be managed by the public at large.

We are not finished till sunlight kills the "noxious germs".

Brooklyn Lyceum Maru - Just Us?
cultural town hall seeks due process programming warriors - facts, law and caselaw are unequivocally on the side of the Brooklyn Lyceum, the courts, not so much. - MORE

Richard Pryor once had a bit about justice ...

"If you're {going downtown..}looking for justice, that's just what you'll find -- just us."


The rules that judges are required to follow aren't that hard, and, in New York, you need to be an attorney for 10 years before you can be elected a judge.

The decade of service rule is a simple one that ensures, by way of ten (10) years of legal experience, that you probably know what due process is and what discretionary is, but probably has a sinister alternate reasoning,  ..ten years is enough time to learn what to do when you don't have any preconceived opinion and how to do what you want to do when you have a preconceived opinion.


Those rules are defined by hundreds of years of caselaw (the "common law"), the United States and New York State Constitutions, the statutes that approximate the "common law", and decisions since the statutes that expand the statute to encompass, minimally, the "common law" it "replaced", save for places where the statute explicitly replaced, removed (such as the removal of common law marriage in New York  State), modified or even expanded the "common law" (such as motions to vacate).

But with regards to due process, that thing without which we are nothing, it is excruciatingly simple, NOTICE and OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.

Anywhere Notice and Opportunity to be Heard are missing, the court never obtained the right to rule.

We have run into some stellar judges (Arthur Schack, Remy Smith), but most really beat up on the self represented by ignoring DUE PROCESS , and the beast that rears its head when due process is ignored/denied/violated, JURISDICTION, another spin on the court's right to rule.


That something is amiss.

Simple laws, simple facts, simple caselaw and different decisions for the self represented than those represented by counsel show how skewed the system is, unwatched by non-parties.


Seeking to compel the judicial system to do what the rules require, whether it is convenient or not.

AD2 Maru - year in the valley
jurisdiction ain't what is used to be ... - AD2 ignores jurisdiction, makes up facts and treats pro se litigants differently? - MORE
PREAMBLE - The Brooklyn Lyceum went into the belly of the judicial beast on September 6, 2018:   oral argument of four slam dunk appeals at the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department.

The Brooklyn Lyceum was seeking to overturn lower court rulings regarding abandonment of a claim, perjury by an attorney, and contempt of an order that never was in effect.

After having watched about 30 hours or so of 2018 oral arguments the Lyceum was confident that, given the commentary by judges in those hours, and, after waiting more than 2.5 years to be calendared, justice would be done.

That justice would be the clear application of basic legal concepts, simple statutes, iron clad case law and the common law to simple fact patterns, especially the unequivocal lack of jurisdiction:

  • --that, on the record before the court, doing simple addition and subtraction ((service date + proof of service date+10 days +365) < date of motion), the case was statutorily abandoned stripping the court of  any power it had in the case whatsoever, and,
  • --failure to serve any motion or papers on attorney for two defendants, and,
  • --no matter whom was served, noticing all parties to appear ten years in the past, and 
  • --an attorney committed perjury swearing in an affidavit that  a document proving acquired standing existed when his client first appeared some 9 months prior, when, in fact, that document requisite for standing we mere days prior, some 9 months after appearing without standing.
  • --an order served, not within 21 days, as per the order, but at 45 days, was not in effect, ever.

Nothing could be further from the truth than the court doing justice as the law required.

Presiding Judge Reinaldo Rivera's statements that the Second Department had "an excellent  reputation" and "we will get to the bottom" of this proved to be red herrings, if not flat out lies.


  • --the court found that 19 was greater  than 26.
  • the court went outside the record, contrary to all precedent on the issue, precedent that says if you can't be bothered to put it a necessary reason in the moving papers, you can't add it later.
  • --the court, after having gone outside the record, failed to follow the judicial equivalent of the hippocratic oath to first, do no harm, when it, by accepting papers outside the record as being dispositive, failed to do what it had done as recently as two weeks prior to the oral argument, change the record nun pro tunc, but resetting both sides back to the nun pro tunc date.
  • --the court, rather than addressing how and when the non-initiating plaintiff acquired standing, altered the appeal brief from alleging Ex-trinsic fraud(with no time limit to vacate) to In-trinsic fraud which has, historically, but no court dares cite the source, had a two year deadline to vacate.
  • --the court, rather than address the requirement that contempt can only be found if the order was still in effect, ignored that part of the case cited that required the order still be in effect, setting precedent allowing contempt to exist of orders no longer in effect.


  • --When asked to reconsider 19 is greater than 26 ... Denied.
  • --When asked to reconsider affirming contempt without addressing whether the order was in effect ... Denied.
  • --When asked to reconsider stealth nun pro tunc of evidence submission .. Denied.
  • --When asked to reconsider failure to address jurisdictional arguments raised, and not rebutted, at oral argument ... Denied.
  • --When asked to reconsider perjury allegation of non-initiating plaintiff acquiring standing from initiating plaintiff ... Denied.


  • --This situation is so kafka-esque, that something needs to be done.
  • --If not now, then when?
  • --If not the Brooklyn Lyceum, then who.


Captain Kirk reprogrammed an un-winnable test at Star Fleet Academy, the KOBAYASHI MARU.

We seek to make the slam dunk cases winnable by collecting enough information to fight the power.

Join us.

When the system give you a lemon, return it! - Remove judges who ... are not smarter than a 5th grader - MORE
Political machine inertia ... -

... is the primary force in elections.

With so much going on in everyone's lives outside the election of judges, very rarely is the public informed enough to make an informed decision when an attorney is first up for election as a judge, resulting in party-line votes without any substantive evaluation of the candidates.

But in the Kings County Supreme Court, they must come up for re-election every 14 years for Supreme Court and 10 years for Civil Court.

After a decade or more of being a judge, one has more than party-backing to go by.

Until recently, reviews of how a judge did during his or her 10/14 year term were hard to come by.

Now we present scorecard of sorts.

Old Guard still standing ...

  • --The media gives way too much air time to climate change deniers who don't know what they're talking
  • --The United States government has begun releasing records pertaining to the brutal killing of Saudi j
  • --Thousands of teachers in black brave heavy rain to launch rally supporting Hong Kong’s young protest
  • --Opinion: Hong Kong Protesters Might Bother Tourists, Or Pierce Their Conscience
  • --Repercussions Of Family Separations Continue
  • --Understanding Kashmir
  • --Sudan conflict: Army and civilians seal power-sharing deal
  • --Kashmir's communications partially restored, says India
  • --Bangladesh fire: 15,000 homes destroyed in Dhaka slum
  • --Hickenlooper Exits as O’Rourke Presses On: This Week in the 2020 Race
  • --Israel’s Alliance With Trump Creates New Tensions Among American Jews
  • --Trump and Netanyahu Put Bipartisan Support for Israel at Risk

Indie news of note ...

  • --Historic Maritime Landmark Under Threat After Construction Mishap
  • --In Northeast Philadelphia, A Rich History Of Train Tracks And Acquisitions
  • --Eastern State Penitentiary Illuminates “Hidden Lives” Of The Incarcerated
  • --Why Can’t I Take Public Transit to the Beach?
  • --CityLab Daily: How HUD Could Dismantle a Pillar of Civil Rights Law
  • --How HUD Could Dismantle a Pillar of Civil Rights Law
  • --How a Video Gambling Company Helped Bankroll Local Politicians
  • --“Dirtbag,” “Savages,” “Subhuman”: A Border Agent’s Hateful Career and the Crime That Finally Ended I
  • --ProPublica’s “Flood Thy Neighbor” Investigation Wins 2019 Communication Award
  • --Mainstream media supports flawed Chicago Police gun ‘offender’ data portal
  • --Why meritocracy is a myth in college admissions
  • --Fifty years ago, Jimi Hendrix’s Woodstock anthem expressed the hopes and fears of a nation

Science feeds of note ...

  • --10 rules for picking the perfect campsite
  • --Last week in tech: Snap’s new spectacles, Sega’s Genesis Mini, and the clickiest new keyboards aroun
  • --Dwarf star planets could glow with life
  • --From tusks to tails, nations eye trade in endangered species
  • --Beloved baby dugong 'Mariam' dies in Thailand with plastic in stomach
  • --Tokyo 2020 paratriathlon test shortened due to bad water quality
  • --'Mining Bitcoin On a 1983 Apple II: a Highly Impractical Guide'
  • --Chrome and Firefox Changes Spark the End of 'Extended Validation' Certificates
  • --US Set To Give Huawei Another 90 Days To Buy From American Suppliers
  • --Alzheimer’s targets brain cells that help people stay awake
  • --A new FDA-approved drug takes aim at a deadly form of tuberculosis
  • --LIGO and Virgo probably spotted the first black hole swallowing up a neutron star

Evolution feeds of note ...

  • --Climate Change Is Breaking Earth’s Beat
  • --An Ecological Loop: Host Microbiomes across Multitrophic Interactions
  • --Linking Traits across Ecological Scales Determines Functional Resilience
  • --Evolution Gave Us Heart Disease. We’re Not Stuck With It.
  • --A Battle Is Raging in the Tree of Life
  • --Frances Arnold Turns Microbes Into Living Factories
  • --Does Long-Term Selection for Development Time Result in Canalization: A Test Using Drosophila melano
  • --A Toggle-Switch and a Feed-Forward Loop Engage in the Control of the Drosophila Retinal Determinatio
  • --Phenotypic Plasticity, Developmental Instability, and Robustness: The Concepts and How They Are Conn
  • --Morality Regulates Our Social Physiology
  • --The Human Social Organism and a Parliament of Genes
  • --Master Class: A Conversation with Jonathan Birch About the Equivalence of Theories of Social Evoluti

Espresso feeds of note ...

  • --What Is a Cacao Cut Test & When Is it Useful?
  • --Cómo Introducir a Los Clientes al Café de la Tercera Ola
  • --Cómo Forjar y Mantener Relaciones Con tu Comprador de Café
  • --James Hoffmann Wants You To Microwave Your Coffee
  • --What Kind Of Nut Milk Are You?
  • --Cup Of Excellence Enjoyed By All (Except Indonesia)
  • --Making Cold Brew Coffee With the Primula Coffee Maker
  • --Inanimate Objects Comics #70
  • --The Coffee Lover’s Diet – 10 Ideas from the Book
  • --Stir More Often! Seriously, try this
  • --A little “latte” quotes cause the fauxpresso came from the aeropress with the Fellow Prismo!
  • --Enjoying some Kalita wave pour over at La Cabra in Aarhus Denmark!